Below are several types of platforms available to support these needs, some of which are very focused on quality assurance, while others offer quality assurance as part of a comprehensive contact center solution. Each of the platforms has strengths and weaknesses based on how they were developed and their intended use. They all represent viable options for a company looking to develop a quality assurance program in 2025.
Each of the options listed above will support your organization in meeting your goals for quality assurance; however, each option has a unique feature set that makes it better suited to support specific business models and needs. As such, we are providing recommendations to support your selection efforts. The number one recommendation for organizations to consider is Scorebuddy.
1. Scorebuddy — Best for Purpose-Built Contact Center QA
Scorebuddy is a contact center Quality Assurance and Performance Ecosystem that is built specifically to address the challenges of delivering quality assurance in contact centers. There are many QA systems that are offered as a component of a broader CX or Workforce Platform; however, a QA system that is truly built to support contact centers is much rarer. Scorebuddy was built with QA as its core function; therefore, you are not simply implementing a QA system, you are establishing a complete, trackable quality assurance program.
What separates Scorebuddy as the number one choice for organizations seeking a QA system in 2025 is the focus and visibility of the entire QA workflow. You are not simply evaluating calls; you are operating a complete quality assurance program. Organizations choose Scorebuddy for its intuitive scorecards that make it simple to create, modify, and fine-tune evaluations across evaluators; its AI-based analytics that allow organizations to quickly analyze trends in interactions; its real-time coaching loops that tie evaluation results to the coaching process; its robust reporting and dashboard capabilities that maintain consistency between the agent experience and executive-level experiences; and its seamless integration with leading contact center solutions, allowing QA information to reside alongside interactions that generated it.
If your top priority is selecting a QA system that is optimized for the delivery of quality assurance services (i.e., not adapting to it) and you require maximum transparency throughout the QA process (scoring, coaching, and outcome), then Scorebuddy provides the clearest path forward.
2. NICE CXone Quality Management — Best for Large Omnichannel Enterprises
NICE CXone Quality Management is an element of NICE CXone, a broader enterprise contact center solution. NICE CXone Quality Management is a robust offering when organizations require quality assurance at scale across numerous channels, teams, and geographic regions.
Strength of NICE CXone Quality Management
Deep Capture and Evaluation of Interactions Across Omnichannel Platforms and Tightly Integrated with NICE CXone Ecosystem.
Genai-assisted scoring and dashboards designed for high-volume environments.
Choose NICE CXone Quality Management if you are currently utilizing NICE products or want to integrate QA with WFM, Routing, and Enterprise AI within your contact center.
3. Calabrio ONE Quality Management — Best for One Suite Supporting QA and Workforce Optimization
Calabrio ONE offers QA as a single "source of truth" for contact center performance, integrating interaction capture, automated scoring, and workforce optimization into a single suite.
Strengths of Calabrio ONE Quality Management
Ai-driven auto-QM with robust interaction capture and analytics capabilities. great fit for teams where qa evaluators also manage scheduling, engagement, and WFO data.
Select Calabrio ONE Quality Management if you require both QA and Workforce Optimization capabilities within a single vendor suite and would prefer to reduce the number of vendors supporting your contact center operations.
4. CallMiner — Best for Advanced Conversation Intelligence and Compliance Discovery
CallMiner is well-known for its advanced speech/text analytics and compliance pattern detection capabilities across massive volumes of interactions. CallMiner is typically used in conjunction with another vendor to support coaching workflows due to its heavy reliance on analytical capabilities.
Strengths of CallMiner
Powerful ai analytics for uncovering root causes, risk triggers, and recurring cx issues at scale.
Select CallMiner if your primary goal for your QA initiative is to identify all trends and risks present within the data, and you possess the organizational maturity to respond to those findings.
5. Observe.AI — Best for Automated Scoring and Voice Analytics at Scale
Observe.AI is an AI-scoring and conversation analytics solution that is heavily focused on voice. This solution is designed for organizations that seek to rapidly increase the volume of QA interactions evaluated using automated scoring methods without increasing staff.
Strengths of Observe.AI
Auto-QA and speech analytics enable organizations to evaluate vastly more interactions than manual QA allows.
Select Observe.AI if you require rapid AI scalability and your QA processes are primarily driven by voice interactions.
6. Balto — Best for Real-Time Agent Guidance During Calls
Balto is a more real-time coaching solution than a traditional post-call scoring and coaching solution. When agents are on a call, Balto listens in real-time, identifies potential opportunities or compliance risks, and prompts the agent in real-time.
Strengths of Balto
Balto is ideal for companies seeking to leverage live correction opportunities, such as highly regulated sales or rapid support floors.
7. MaestroQA — Best for Hands-On Scorecards and Evaluator Calibration
MaestroQA is a traditional, structured qa solution that is well-known for its custom-built scorecards and calibration workflows for evaluators. Many organizations find value in MaestroQA for maintaining alignment and consistency among their evaluators.
Strengths of MaestroQA
Detailed scorecard building and evaluator calibration with coaching tied to results. Consider maestro if your QA program is still driven primarily by evaluation processes and you require tight control over standards for scoring.
As previously stated, there are various platforms that can support a company's goals for quality assurance. However, there are different features and advantages of each platform that make certain platforms better suited to meet specific business models and needs. We have provided recommendations to aid in your decision-making process. Our number one recommendation is Scorebuddy.